Working hour: Monday – Friday/8AM – 5PM

|

Email: contact@mcac.vn

|

Hotline: (+84) 935 925 068 - 0236 3656799

| Language:

Điện thoại: (+84) 935 925 068

Language:

About MCAC

The Middle Commercial Arbitration Center (MCAC) was established under Decision No. .../BTP-GP dated... of the Minister of Justice and Decision No. .../QD-BTP date... of the Minister of Justice on the grant of license for establishment of Commercial Arbitration Center in Vietnam. The Department of Justice of Da Nang City issued the Certificate of Operation Registration No. .../TP-DKHD-TT dated... to MCAC.

Arbitration

The Middle Commercial Arbitration Center (MCAC) recommends that the parties in the contract use the following model arbitration clause

Mediation

For the purpose of ensuring that the agreement clearly expresses the will of the parties to choose to settle any dispute arising out of or in connection with the contract by mediation at the Middle Commercial Arbitration Center (MCAC), MCAC recommends that Parties use one of the following model mediation clauses:

THE MIDDLE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION CENTER

 

The Middle Commercial Arbitration Center (MCAC) was established under Decision No. .../BTP-GP dated... of the Minister of Justice and Decision No. .../QD-BTP date... of the Minister of Justice on the grant of license for establishment of Commercial Arbitration Center in Vietnam. The Department of Justice of Da Nang City issued the Certificate of Operation Registration No. .../TP-DKHD-TT dated... to MCAC.

Office

115 Nguyen Van Linh, Hai Chau District, Da Nang City

Email

contact@mcac.vn

Phone

(+84) 935 925 068

Working hour

Monday – Friday/8AM – 5PM

Where to receive documents

7th floor, Muong Thanh building, 115 Nguyen Van Linh, Da Nang city

Arbitration

 

The Middle Commercial Arbitration Center (MCAC) recommends that the parties in the contract use the following model arbitration clause:

News

WHAT DOCUMENTS MUST ACCOMPANY A STATEMENT OF CLAIM FILED WITH AN ARBITRATION CENTER?
14 09/2026

WHAT DOCUMENTS MUST ACCOMPANY A STATEMENT OF CLAIM FILED WITH AN ARBITRATION CENTER?

When initiating arbitration proceedings, properly preparing the Statement of Claim together with the accompanying documents and evidence is an important first step. The Statement of Claim sets out the Claimant’s requests; however, in order for the arbitration center to process the case and for the Arbitral Tribunal to have sufficient grounds to resolve the dispute, the Claimant should also submit documents establishing the Tribunal’s jurisdiction, the disputed legal relationship, and the basis for each claim.

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT ARISING DURING THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS: COMMENTARY ON DECISION NO. 1185/2022/QĐ-PQTT OF THE PEOPLE'S COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY
11 09/2026

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT ARISING DURING THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS: COMMENTARY ON DECISION NO. 1185/2022/QĐ-PQTT OF THE PEOPLE'S COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

An arbitration agreement serves as the basis for determining the jurisdiction of arbitration to resolve disputes. Under the Law on Commercial Arbitration, an arbitration agreement may be entered into either before or after a dispute arises and must be made in a form compliant with applicable law. Decision No. 1185/2022/QĐ-PQTT dated 29 July 2022 of the People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City concerns the determination of an arbitration agreement during the dispute resolution process and the parties’ right to object to the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal.

ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: COMMENTARY ON DECISION NO. 810/2017/QD-PQTT OF THE PEOPLE’S COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY
07 09/2026

ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: COMMENTARY ON DECISION NO. 810/2017/QD-PQTT OF THE PEOPLE’S COURT OF HO CHI MINH CITY

Decision No. 810/2017/QD-PQTT dated 29 June 2017 of the People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City provides a noteworthy example. Although the person who signed the contract on behalf of the Respondent was not its legal representative, the Court nevertheless held that the arbitration agreement remained valid, taking into account the parties’ subsequent performance of the contract and the conduct of the person having proper authority in relation to the transaction.

Contact with THE MIDDLE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION CENTER