Working hour: Monday – Friday/8AM – 5PM
|Email: contact@mcac.vn
|Hotline: (+84) 935 925 068 - 0236 3656799
| Language:Điện thoại: (+84) 935 925 068
16/03/2026
In current investment and business activities, many commercial transactions are directly related to land use rights, such as project transfers, investment cooperation, land leases, or real estate development. When disputes arise, in addition to court proceedings, a commonly raised question is whether disputes related to land can be resolved through commercial arbitration.
The Land Law 2024 has introduced new provisions recognising the possibility of resolving certain land-related disputes through commercial arbitration. However, not all land disputes fall within the jurisdiction of arbitration. Correctly identifying the nature of the dispute is therefore essential in determining the appropriate dispute resolution mechanism.

Pursuant to Article 3(47) of the Land Law 2024, a land dispute is defined as a dispute concerning the rights and obligations of land users between two or more parties in land-related legal relationships.
According to Resolution No. 04/2017/NQ-HĐTP dated 5 May 2017 of the Council of Judges of the Supreme People’s Court, disputes related to land are generally classified into two main categories:
Pursuant to Article 2 of the Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010, arbitration has jurisdiction to resolve the following types of disputes:
Accordingly, the jurisdiction of arbitration is primarily associated with disputes arising from commercial activities or with cases where the law expressly permits dispute resolution through arbitration.
The Land Law 2024 introduces new provisions recognising the jurisdiction of commercial arbitration in resolving certain disputes related to land. In particular, Article 236(5) of the Land Law 2024 provides that:
“Disputes between parties arising from commercial activities related to land shall be resolved by the courts in accordance with civil procedure law or by Vietnamese commercial arbitration in accordance with the law on commercial arbitration.”
In addition, Article 236(6) of the Land Law 2024 stipulates that People’s Committees at all levels are responsible for providing dossiers and documents relating to land management and land use at the request of the court or commercial arbitration for the purpose of resolving the dispute.
Accordingly, the current land legislation recognises the jurisdiction of commercial arbitration to resolve disputes arising from commercial activities related to land. In practice, disputes falling within this category often arise from commercial transactions involving land use rights, such as:
Conversely, land disputes that do not arise from commercial activities do not fall within the jurisdiction of arbitration. Examples include:
It can be observed that the current land legislation clearly recognises that disputes arising from commercial activities related to land may be resolved through commercial arbitration. These new provisions allow the parties concerned greater flexibility in selecting an appropriate dispute resolution mechanism.
Arbitration, with its advantages such as procedural flexibility, confidentiality, relatively efficient resolution timelines, and the final and binding nature of arbitral awards (which are not subject to appeal or protest), may therefore constitute a suitable option for parties involved in commercial disputes relating to land.
The article above has analyzed in detail is "Can land-related disputes be resolved through arbitration?". For more detailed information or legal assistance, please contact the MCAC Secretariat:
Correctly determining the procedural status of parties is one of the essential conditions for ensuring the legality of dispute resolution through arbitration. If a person or entity that does not possess rights or obligations in the disputed legal relationship is improperly identified as a claimant or respondent, such misidentification may directly affect the parties’ right to be heard and may also constitute grounds for setting aside an arbitral award pursuant to Point (b), Clause 2, Article 68 of the 2010 Law on Commercial Arbitration (“LCA”).
An analysis of Decision No. 1062/2022/QĐ-PQTT issued by the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court concerning the annulment of an arbitral award due to procedural violations and inconsistency with the fundamental principles of Vietnamese law.